Decisiones en reuniones de academia: el caso de un profesor de matemáticas

Isaias Miranda Viramontes; Ana Luisa Gómez Blancarte; Wilmer Hilmar Pérez Jiménez

doi:10.31391/S2007-7033(2024)0063-012

Autores

Isaias Miranda Viramontes , Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México , https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2076-7383 (não autenticado)
Ana Luisa Gómez Blancarte , Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México , https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8837-8643 (não autenticado)
Wilmer Hilmar Pérez Jiménez , Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México , https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7055-0424 (não autenticado)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31391/S2007-7033(2024)0063-012

Resumo

Com base nos conceitos de competência e experiência de significado da teoria das Comunidades de Prática, analisa-se o processo de tomada de decisão de um professor universitário de matemática que, em reuniões da academia, propõe a implementação de uma nova estratégia de ensino. A metodologia foi qualitativa, na forma de um estudo de caso. Os resultados indicam que esse processo é influenciado pela inter-relação entre as reflexões cotidianas do professor e as demandas de sua instituição de ensino. Conclui-se que as diferentes práticas das quais os professores participam em seu trabalho profissional contribuem para suas decisões.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

Isaias Miranda Viramontes, , Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México,

Doctor en Ciencias especialidad en Matemática Educativa. Profesor-investigador del Programa de Matemática Educativa del CICATA-Legaria del Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Líneas de investigación: construcción social del conocimiento matemático y estudios sobre la práctica docente y cultura matemática del profesor de matemáticas.
Ana Luisa Gómez Blancarte, , Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México,

Doctora en Ciencias especialidad en Matemática Educativa. Profesora-investigadora del Programa de Matemática Educativa del CICATA-Legaria del Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Líneas de investigación: desarrollo profesional docente y didáctica de la estadística y probabilidad.
Wilmer Hilmar Pérez Jiménez, , Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México,

Maestro en Ciencias en Matemática Educativa. Profesor de matemáticas en la Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Ingeniería, Campus Guanajuato, del Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Líneas de investigación: prácticas del profesor de nivel superior.

Referências

Bishop, A. J. (1976). Decision-making, the intervening variable. Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 7, núm. 1–2, pp. 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00144357

Bohl, J. V. y Van Zoest, L. R. (2003). The value of Wenger’s concepts of modes of participation and regimes of accountability in understanding teacher learning. En N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, y J. T. Zilliox (eds.). Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education held jointly with the 25th Conference of PME-NA (pp. 339–346). Center for Research and Development Group.

Borko, H., Roberts, S. A. y Shavelson, R. (2008). Teachers’ decision making from Alan J. Bishop to today. En P. Clarkson y N. Presmeg (eds.). Critical Issues in Mathematics Education (pp. 37–67). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09673-5_4

Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. En M. Bosch (ed.). Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 21–30). Universidad Ramon Llull. http://erme.site/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/CERME4_2_Plenaries.pdf

Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, vol. 19, núm. 2, pp. 221–266. https://revue-rdm.com/1999/l-analyse-des-pratiques/

Cohen, L., Manion, L. y Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.

Contu, A. y Willmot, H. (2006). Studying practice: situating talking about machines. Organization Studies, vol. 27, núm. 12, pp. 1769–1782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606071895

D’Eon, M., Overgaard, V. y Rutledge, H. S. (2000). Teaching as a social practice: Implications for faculty development. Advances in Health Sciences Education, vol. 5, núm. 2, pp. 151–162. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009898031033

Engeström, Y. (2001). Making expansive decisions: An activity-theoretical study of practitioners building collaborative medical care for children. En C. M. Allwood y M. Selart (eds.). Decision making: social and creative dimensions (pp. 281–301). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9827-9_14

Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. En Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen y R. L. Punamäki (eds.). Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–39). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774

Gómez-Blancarte, A. L., y Miranda, I. (2021). Participation and reification: Two basic design principles for mathematics professional development programs. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, vol. 21, núm. 3, pp. 625–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-021-00175-1

Herbers, M. S., Antelo, A., Etting, D. y Buck, A. M. (2011). Improving teaching through a community of practice. Journal of Transformative Education, vol. 9, núm. 2, pp. 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344611430688

Kim, H.-j., Metzger, M. y Heaton, R. M. (2020). Teacher planning sessions as professional opportunities to learn: An elementary mathematics teacher’s re-conceptualization of instructional triangles. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 20, pp. 1207–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10019-y

Lande, E. y Mesa, V. (2016). Instructional decision making and agency of community college mathematics faculty. ZDM Mathematics Education, vol. 48, núm. 1–2, pp. 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0736-x

Long, M. (2017). High medieval monasteries as communities of practice: approaching monastic learning through letters. Journal of Religious History, vol. 41, núm. 1, pp. 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9809.12345

Mercado-Maldonado, R. (2002). Los saberes docentes como construcción social. La enseñanza centrada en los niños. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Miranda, I. y Gómez-Blancarte, A. L. (2018). La enseñanza de las matemáticas con el enfoque de la teoría de comunidades de práctica. Educación Matemática, vol. 30, núm. 3, pp. 269–288. https://doi.org/10.24844/em3003.11

Morgan, C. (2014). Understanding practices in mathematics education: structure and text. Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 87, núm. 2, pp. 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9482-6

Olson, J. K. (1992). Understanding teaching. Beyond expertise. Open University Press.

Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Cornell University Press.

Pinzón, A. y Gómez, P. (2021). Toma de decisiones en el aula: estudio de casos de profesores de matemáticas. PNA, vol. 16, núm. 1, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v16i1.15674

Pinzón, A. y Gómez, P. (2019). Un modelo para la toma de decisiones del profesor de matemáticas. PNA, vol. 13, núm. 3, pp. 130–146. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v13i3.7908

Potari, D. y Stouraitis, K. (2019). Teacher decision making. En D. Potari y O. Chapman (eds.). International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Volume 1 (pp. 303–325). Brill. https://brill.com/display/title/60697

Schoenfeld, A. (2011). How we think. A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. Routledge.

Shavelson, R. J. (1973). What is the basic teaching skill? Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 24, núm. 2, pp. 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717302400213

Shulman, L. S. y Elstein, A. S. (1975). Studies of problem solving, judgment, and decision making: Implications for educational research. En F. N. Kerlinger (ed.). Review of Research in Education (pp. 3–42). F. E. Peacock. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167252

Skott, J. (2013). Understanding the role of the teacher in emerging classroom practices: searching for patterns of participation. ZDM Mathematics Education, vol. 45, núm. 4, pp. 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0500-z

Star, S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. En L. Gasser y M. N. Huhns (eds.). Distributed artificial intelligence (pp. 37–54). Ptman. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-55860-092-8.50006-X

Stockero, S. y Van Zoest, L. (2013). Characterizing pivotal teaching moments in beginning mathematics teachers' practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, vol. 16, núm. 2, pp. 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9222-3

Stouraitis, K., Potari, D. y Skott, J. (2017). Contradictions, dialectical oppositions and shifts in teaching mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 95, núm. 2, pp. 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9749-4

Sullivan, P. y Mousley, J. (2001). Thinking teaching: Seeing mathematics teachers as active decision makers. En F. L. Lin y T. J. Cooney (eds.). Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 147–163). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0828-0_7

Trouche, L. Gueudet, G. y Pepin, B. (2018). Documentation approach to didactics. En S. Lerman (ed.). Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 1–11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_100011-1

Wenger, E. (2001). Comunidades de práctica: aprendizaje, significado e identidad (G. Sánchez Barberán, traducción). Paidós Ibérica.

Wenger, E., White, N. y Smith, J. (2010). Learning in communities. En U. D. Ehlers y D. Schneckenberg (eds.). Changing cultures in higher education. Moving ahead to future learning (pp. 257–284). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03582-1_20