Overseen presence of critical literacy in Mexico: Eight cases to be analyzed

Authors

  • Rosa María Quesada Mejía Universidad Iberoamericana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31391/S2007-7033(2021)0056-009

Keywords:

critical thinking, model teachers, communicative skills, educational standards

Abstract

This article presents eight experiences of critical literacy pedagogy in public and private schools in Mexico. Methodologically, case studies were carried out, employing as unit of analysis the perspective and pedagogical practice of specific teachers. Based on Latin American views on critical literacy (Freire 1970; Hernández 2016), we reflect on the difference between educational environments where critical literacy is enacted vs those in which it is not. The key finding is that critical literacy is enacted not just in formal language classes (e.g. reading and writing courses), but also in courses of diverse contents; we also found that even teachers who declare not to work with critical literacy in mind, they actually enact it in their pedagogy practice. In conclusion, the quality of education would significantly improve if the teachers developed awareness of the possibilities that a critical approach lends to literacy work, for which they could use, as a model, experiences such as those presented in this article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rosa María Quesada Mejía, Universidad Iberoamericana

Doctora en Pedagogía por la UNAM. Profesora en la Universidad Iberoamericana, campus Santa Fe, Ciudad de México. Línea de investigación: cultura escrita y literatura infantil y juvenil.

References

Bachillerato Internacional (s.f.). El estilo de enseñanza del IB. Recuperado de https://www.ibo.org/es/benefits-of-the-ib/the-ib-teaching-style/
Cassany, D. (2006). Tras las líneas. México: Anagrama.
Church, M. et al. (2011). Making thinking visible. Nueva York: Jossey-Bass.
De Grasse Tyson, N. (2019). Scientific thinking and communication masterclass. Recuperado de https://www.masterclass.com/classes/neil-degrasse-tyson-teaches-scientific-thinking-and-communication/chapters/inspire-curiosity-in-your-audience
Elbruch, W. (2005). La gran pregunta. México: Ediciones Tecolote.
Freire, P. (2011). La educación como práctica de la libertad (25 edición). México: Siglo XXI.
Freire, P. (2008). Miedo y osadía. La cotidianidad del docente que se arriesga a practicar una pedagogía transformadora. México: Siglo XXI.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del oprimido. México: Siglo XXI.
Hernández, G. (2016). Literacidad académica. México: UAM.
Hernández, G. y Quesada, R. (2020). La lectura y la escritura universitarias como herramientas para transformar el pensamiento. Revista Didac, núm. 75, enero-junio, pp. 40-47.
Larrosa, J. (2003). La experiencia de la lectura. Estudios sobre literatura y formación. México: FCE.
Nussbaum, M. (2008). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. EUA: Harvard University Press.
Saavedra, J., Alasuutari, H. y Gutiérrez, M. (2019). Los maestros y la confianza, los pilares del sistema educativo de Finlandia. Banco Mundial Blogs. Recuperado de https://blogs.worldbank.org/es/education/los-maestros-y-la-confianza-los-pilares-del-sistema-educativo-de-finlandia
SEP (2018). Aprendizajes clave para la educación integral. México.
Unicef (2019). Elementos críticos para la transmisión hacia las habilidades para la vida: desmitificando los conceptos. Nueva Delhi.
Vázquez, V. (2017). Critical literacy. Oxford Research Encylcopedias. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.20

Published

2021-02-28