Hybrid Learning Scenarios and the Design of Virtual Communities in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31391/S2007-7033(2022)0058-002Abstract
The evolution of digital technologies and communication networks has led to the emergence of a reticular society marked by significant changes in the economy and the labor market, driving the birth of new paradigms, models, educational communication processes, and new teaching and learning scenarios. This reality, therefore, demands urgent thought to create and develop structures that respond to these changes, with digitally innovative institutions capable of transforming the educational reality. Integrating audiovisual technologies in an educational context may be a very appropriate strategy to revitalize the educational experience, and it is precisely the creation of hybrid learning scenarios enriched with the presence of the audiovisual that we intend to analyze, describing its impact on the design of a virtual community. For that, we use the qualitative analysis of the perceptions of twenty students attending Higher Education, at postgraduate level, having as reference the pedagogical models developed by Garrison and collaborators (2000) and Moreira (2017). The results reveal that the creation of these hybrid scenarios, of a digital education ecosystem enriched with audiovisual technologies, anchored in the referenced models, can have very positive effects on the creation and development of virtual learning communities.
Downloads
References
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R. & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, vol. 5, núm. 2, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
Bardin L. (1977). L´analyse de contenu. Paris: PUF.
DigitalEcosystem (2007). The Information Resource about the European approach on Digital Business Ecosystems. http://www.digital-ecosystems.org/
Garrison, D. R. (2016). Thinking collaboratively: Learning in a Community of Inquiry. New York: Routledge.
Garrison, D. & Anderson, T. (2005). El e-learning en el siglo XXI. Investigación e práctica. Barcelona: Octaedro.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 15, núm. 1, pp. 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 2, núm. 2-3, pp. 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R. & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 19, núm. 3, pp. 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
Harasim. L. (2015). Educação online e as implicações da inteligência artificial. Revista da FAAEBA, Educação e Contemporaneidade, vol. 24, núm. 44, pp. 25-39. https://www.revistas.uneb.br/index.php/faeeba/article/view/12091
Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, vol. 13, pp. 20-30.
Monteiro, A., Moreira, J. A. & Lencastre, J. A. (2015). Blended (E)learning na sociedade digital. Whitebooks: Santo Tirso.
Moreira, J. A. (2017). A pedagogical model to deconstruct moving pictures in virtual learning environments and its impact on the self-concept of postgraduate students. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, vol. 13, núm. 1, pp. 77-90. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1255
Moreira, J. A., Ferreira, A. G. & Almeida, A. C. (2013). Comparing communities of inquiry in higher education students: one for all or one for each? OpenPraxis, vol. 5, núm. 2, pp. 165-178.
Moreira, J. A. & Almeida, A. C. (2011). How reliable and consistent is our learning community of inquiry? Psychometric qualities of the community of inquiry survey instrument applied to a sample of higher education Portuguese students. EduLearn 2011. In International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 4th-6th July, Barcelona (Spain).
Moreira J. A. & Dias-Trindade, S. (2020). Online learning environments enriched with audiovisual technologies and its impact on the construction of virtual communities in Higher Education in prison context. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, vol. 16, núm. 1, pp. 9-16. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/113503
Moreira, J. A. & Ferreira, A. G. (2021). Blended and hybrid environments in Higher Education in times of the pandemic. In S. Gonçalves & S. Majhanovich (coord.). Pandemic and remote teaching in Higher Education (pp. 9-20). Coimbra: CINEP, Portugal.
Nunes, C., Moreira, J. A. & Vieira, C. (2020). Comunidades virtuais de aprendizagem e competências-chave para o século XXI no ensino superior a distância. Revista Educaonline, vol. 14, núm. 2, pp. 1-22. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/10413
Salmon, G. (2003). E-ativities: The key to teaching and learning online. Londres: Routledge.
Sandoval, W. & Bell, P. (2004) Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, vol. 39, núm. 4, pp. 199-201. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_1
Spiro, R., Vispoel, W., Schmitz, J., Samarapungavan, A. & Boerger, A. (1987). Knowledge aquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. In B. Britton & C. Glynn C. (eds.). Executive control in processes in reading (pp. 177-199). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vaughan, N. & Garrison, R. (2019). How blended learning can support a faculty development community of inquiry. Online Learning, vol. 10, núm. 4, pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i4.1750
Wang, F. & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 53, núm. 4, pp. 5-23.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sinéctica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license.
Authors who publish in Sinéctica agree to the following terms:
The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of the authorized work simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work as long as both the authorship of the work and the initial publication in this journal are acknowledged.
Authors may enter into additional separate contractual agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or a book), with acknowledgement of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to publish their work in institutional repositories or on their own website before and during the submission process, as it may generate productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work.
Explanatory note: As of 2017 Sinéctica is governed by the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 3.0 International License, a version that standardizes licenses internationally.
Articles published between 1992 and 2016 are covered by a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license, which allows a work to be shared and distributed non-commercially and with acknowledgement of the author, but prohibits modification of the original creation.